designed his own consciousness very much that 
way, so as to keep his Catholicism apart for a 
Sunday or an afternoon mass—which I attended 
with him from time to time—but his intellectual 
integrity and his ability to vivisect an argument 
without using any kind of exegesis or biblical 
terminology, is quite intact. An apartheid between 
the two he kept straight in his verbal repertoire 
and his linguistics. Does that mean he kept 
separated out a Catholic epistemology? No, he did 
see the world as whole. He did quote du Chardin, he 
did use thinkers who had a Catholic or holistic 
approach. And of course he was very strongly 
influenced by Chesterton, by Ong, by Augustine,